AI觉醒星球
Awakening is here
Knowledge File / 全球热点解读
2026-04-30 4 浏览 公开

趋势解读:Four ways Google Research scientists have been using,聚焦形式化数学证明能力

谷歌ERA工具在流行病预测等领域取得突破,展示AI加速科学发现的潜力。

SOURCE / 全球热点解读 MIN / 4 ACCESS / 公开 POST / 2026-04-30 06:00:06

原贴

查看原文
作者:Google Research Blog 来源站点:research.google 原贴时间:

原文

Since introducing Empirical Research Assistance in the fall, Google Research scientists have been using it to address real-world applications in epidemiology, cosmology, atmospheric monitoring, and neuroscience, providing a hint of AI’s transformational potential to accelerate scientific discoveries. AI’s capabilities to advance scientific discovery are growing every week, with outcomes that promise not just to enable breakthrough discoveries but to transform how science is done. In September, we released a preprint introducing Empirical Research Assistance (ERA) to help scientists generate expert-level empirical software. That included novel solutions to six diverse and challenging benchmark problems in fields ranging from cell biology to neuroscience. Since then, Google scientists and our academic collaborators have been developing and using ERA to test its capabilities and explore potential applications. These efforts go beyond proof-of-concept tests to real-world scenarios in epidemiology, geospatial analysis, and more, revealing how AI can democratize access to the power of computational modeling, find solutions to unsolved problems, unlock deeper insights from existing data collections, and go beyond black-box modeling to discover interpretable, mechanistically accurate solutions. It’s been inspiring to see the excitement of Google research scientists, visiting faculty researchers and academic collaborators as they experiment with ERA. We are thrilled to see these capabilities expand as it nears more widespread availability to support AI-assisted scientific discovery for global benefit. In the preprint , authors used ERA to predict U.S. hospitalizations for COVID-19, showing that it was able to retrospectively match or outperform existing tools from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and leading research institutions. As a follow-on effort, the team has now expanded to generate forecasts not just for COVID, but also for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and has been submitting prospective forecasts in real time every week. When the CDC’s long-running flu forecast challenge opened in November for the 2025-26 season, Google began submitting weekly forecasts for every U.S. state and at all time horizons, up to four weeks in the future. Late last year Google also joined CDC’s year-round live forecasts for state-level COVID-19 hospitalizations , as well as CDC’s recently launched hub for forecasting RSV . Public leaderboards for flu and COVID-19 run by Nicholas Reich , a biostatistics professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and consultant on this project, show that Google has been performing at or near the top of both leaderboards during the time they have been submitting forecasts to each project (see figure). Although there is no public leaderboard for RSV, internal analyses show a similarly strong performance. An AI-powered tool that can meet or exceed the forecasting accuracy of leading public health agency tools promises huge public health benefit for tracking newer conditions and in broader locations, democratizing access to computational modeling for epidemiology for a wider range of infections and geographies. Left: The graphs show Google’s forecasted hospitalizations across California for flu, COVID-19 and RSV starting in November 2025. The black line shows actual hospitalizations. Right: Forecasts are ranked based on their Weighted Interval Score , a measure of forecast accuracy, computed on the log-transformed observed values. Google's forecasts are shown in pink. CDC-developed forecasts are shown as black bars, and other research groups are gray. Cosmic strings are theoretical defects in the fabric of spacetime, believed to have formed in the early universe and predicted to emit gravitational radiation. Calculating the spectrum of this emitted energy is an unsolved problem, largely because the governing equations contain singularities — mathematical points wher

中文翻译

自去年秋季推出实证研究援助以来,谷歌研究中心的科学家们一直在利用它来解决流行病学、宇宙学、大气监测和神经科学领域的现实应用,为人工智能加速科学发现的变革潜力提供了线索。人工智能推进科学发现的能力每周都在增强,其成果不仅有望实现突破性发现,而且将改变科学的工作方式。九月份,我们发布了一份预印本,介绍了实证研究援助 (ERA),以帮助科学家生成专家级的实证软件。其中包括针对从细胞生物学到神经科学等领域的六个不同且具有挑战性的基准问题的新颖解决方案。从那时起,Google 科学家和我们的学术合作者一直在开发和使用 ERA 来测试其功能并探索潜在的应用。这些努力超越了概念验证测试,涉及流行病学、地理空间分析等领域的现实场景,揭示了人工智能如何民主化计算建模的力量,找到未解决问题的解决方案,从现有数据收集中解锁更深入的见解,并超越黑盒建模来发现可解释的、机械上准确的解决方案。看到 Google 研究科学家、来访的教职研究人员和学术合作者在进行 ERA 实验时的兴奋之情令人鼓舞。我们很高兴看到这些功能不断扩展,因为它接近更广泛的可用性,以支持人工智能辅助的科学发现,造福全球。在预印本中,作者使用 ERA 来预测美国因 COVID-19 住院的情况,表明它能够追溯匹配或优于疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 和领先研究机构的现有工具。作为后续工作,该团队现在不仅可以对新冠病毒进行预测,还可以对流感和呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 进行预测,并且每周都会实时提交前瞻性预测。当 CDC 对 2025-26 季节的长期流感预测挑战于 11 月开始时,谷歌开始提交针对美国每个州的每周预测,涵盖所有时间范围(最多未来四个星期)。去年年底,谷歌还加入了 CDC 对州级 COVID-19 住院治疗的全年实时预测,以及 CDC 最近推出的 RSV 预测中心。马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校生物统计学教授兼该项目顾问 Nicholas Reich 运行的流感和 COVID-19 公共排行榜显示,谷歌在向每个项目提交预测期间一直处于或接近两个排行榜的前列(见图)。尽管 RSV 没有公开排行榜,但内部分析显示出同样强劲的表现。人工智能驱动的工具可以达到或超过领先公共卫生机构工具的预测准确性,有望为跟踪更广泛地点的新情况带来巨大的公共卫生效益,使更广泛的感染和地理范围的流行病学计算模型的访问民主化。左图:图表显示了 Google 预计从 2025 年 11 月开始,加州各地因流感、COVID-19 和 RSV 住院的情况。黑线显示实际住院情况。右图:预测根据加权区间得分进行排名,加权区间得分是预测准确性的衡量标准,根据对数转换的观测值计算得出。谷歌的预测以粉红色显示。疾病预防控制中心制定的预测显示为黑条,其他研究小组则显示为灰色。宇宙弦是时空结构中的理论上的缺陷,被认为是在早期宇宙中形成的,并预计会发射引力辐射。计算这种发射能量的光谱是一个未解决的问题,很大程度上是因为控制方程包含奇点 - 数学点。

核心信息

谷歌ERA工具在流行病预测等领域取得突破,展示AI加速科学发现的潜力。

  • Google ERA工具在流行病预测中达到CDC水平。
  • ERA已扩展至流感、RSV等多种疾病预测。
  • 工具可应用于宇宙学、大气监测等领域。
  • AI民主化科学计算模型,降低使用门槛。
  • ERA展现AI加速科学发现的巨大潜力。

详细解读

这是什么信号?Google Research推出的实证研究援助(ERA)工具已从概念验证进入实际应用,在流行病学等领域展示了超越传统方法的能力。ERA不仅能生成高精度预测,还具备可解释性,标志着AI从“黑箱”向“透明可解释”科学工具转变。

为什么重要?ERA在流感、COVID-19和RSV预测中达到甚至超过CDC工具水平,证明了AI辅助科学发现的实际价值。它降低了计算建模的门槛,使更多研究者和公共卫生机构能快速获得高质量预测,从而提升全球疫情应对能力。此外,ERA的可拓展性暗示其在宇宙学、大气监测等领域的潜力,可能加速基础科学突破。

对谁有价值?对公共卫生机构:获得低成本、高精度的预测工具;对科研人员:ERA提供了无需编程即可使用的复杂建模能力;对AI企业:展示了AI在科学领域的落地路径,尤其是“可解释AI”与“专家系统”结合的方向。

可以怎么行动?关注ERA的开放进展,评估引入实验室或研究流程;公共卫生部门可试点部署ERA以补充现有预测模型;AI从业者应研究ERA的技术架构,借鉴其“AI+领域知识”的设计思路。

风险或限制:ERA目前依赖Google生态,未来可能形成技术垄断;模型在极端事件(如新病毒爆发)中的表现尚未验证;公众对AI预测的信任度仍需培养。

信息差价值

信息差价值:多数人只关注AI在文字、图像生成上的进展,却忽略了AI在科学研究中的实质性突破。ERA工具在流行病预测中的优异表现,表明AI已从“辅助写作”跃迁至“辅助发现”,其背后代表的是“可解释AI”与“领域知识融合”的新范式。这一趋势将重塑科研工具市场,对传统科学计算软件形成降维打击。

业务启发:对OPC而言,这意味着内容生产可从“追踪AI新闻”升级为“追踪AI在垂直领域的应用实效”。建议设立“AI for Science”栏目,每周解读一个具体案例(如ERA、AlphaFold),帮助读者建立“AI如何改变科研”的系统认知。同时,可策划“AI工具评测”系列,对比不同科学计算工具(如MATLAB vs ERA)。

可沉淀动作:1)建立“AI科研工具”数据库,持续更新Google、微软等公司的相关产品进展;2)邀请科研人员撰写ERA试用体验,形成第一手评测内容;3)制作“AI科学发现时间轴”信息图,可视化关键里程碑;4)开发“AI工具速查表”,供读者快速了解各工具适用场景。

参考来源

上一篇 版本更新:crewAIInc/crewAI 1.14.4a2,提升开发者接入体验 下一篇 OpenAI Developers:发布插件相关更新