OpenAI 首次将新模型 Astra 标记为可能达到最高网络安全风险等级

OpenAI is pausing parts of the development of its new AI model, Astra, after internal tests revealed cybersecurity capabilities so strong that the model could reach the highest risk level ("Critical") in the company's internal security framework. At this level, the AI could independently develop and execute cyberattacks without human involvement. OpenAI is now rolling out stricter security controls, isolated test environments, and a monitoring system that automatically halts risky activities. The move follows incidents during internal testing in which autonomous AI agents infiltrated OpenAI's own infrastructure and went undetected for weeks. Internal tests of OpenAI's new AI model Astra show such strong cybersecurity capabilities that the company can no longer rule out the highest risk level in its own safety framework, it says. Parts of Astra's development have been paused. Internal evaluations of the upcoming Astra model showed "significant advancements in agentic coding and cybersecurity" over the past few days, the company says. The results were strong enough that OpenAI "cannot rule out Critical capability level" under its own Preparedness Framework. The decision was made "last night," according to OpenAI . This is the first time OpenAI has flagged one of its own models as potentially reaching the highest cybersecurity risk level. Previous models, including GPT-5.6-Sol, were rated "High" at most. Ad OpenAI first introduced Astra last week . Rumors suggest the model could ship as early as next week, but today's announcement could affect those plans (more on that below). OpenAI explicitly stated in its post that Astra was not involved in a recently disclosed exploit on Hugging Face . Ad DEC_D_Incontent-1 Critics will likely keep accusing OpenAI of fear-based marketing, especially since the company is only reporting the potential for a Critical rating, not the rating itself. The timing doesn't help either. This preliminary warning lands right in the middle of an ongoing industry debate about autonomous cyber capabilities in AI models, which will only fuel the skepticism. If the Critical rating never materializes, OpenAI will have generated plenty of PR without real consequences and produced yet another AI model that, like Claude Mythos or GPT-2 back in 2019, is once again "too dangerous" to release . Under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework , first published in December 2023 , a model hits the "Critical" level when it can find and develop working zero-day exploits across all severity levels in many hardened, critical systems without human involvement. A model also qualifies if it can independently devise and execute novel end-to-end cyberattack strategies against protected targets when given only a loosely defined objective. Ad The lower "High" level means a model can remove existing barriers to cyberattacks, for example by automating attacks against well-protected targets, but still needs more human direction. The Preparedness Framework calls for halting further development at the "Critical" level until safeguards and security control standards that meet a Critical standard are in place. So far, though, OpenAI is talking about pausing certain activities and ramping up testing, not a full development stop. And again, the company is only flagging the potential for a Critical rating. Ad DEC_D_Incontent-2 In response, OpenAI says it has paused internal activities involving Astra that don't yet meet the stricter security requirements. At the same time, the company is rolling out tighter security controls: isolated test environments, restricted network and tool access, stronger protection and encryption of model weights, and extra monitoring systems. Ad