AI觉醒星球
Awakening is here
Knowledge File / 全球热点解读
2026-06-28 8 浏览 公开

中国网络安全公司构建AI工具以对标Mythos,并将竞争比喻为网络核威慑

360发布两款AI安全工具,对标Anthropic的Mythos,创始人周鸿祎称中国AI模型落后20-30%,需建立网络核威慑。

SOURCE / 全球热点解读 MIN / 9 ACCESS / 公开 POST / 2026-06-28 17:30:18

原贴

查看原文
作者:Matthias Bastian 来源站点:the-decoder.com 原贴时间:

原文

Chinese cybersecurity company 360 Security Technology has unveiled two AI tools for automated vulnerability hunting and cyber defense, pitched as China's answer to Anthropic's Mythos. Founder Zhou Hongyi says China's top AI models still trail Western systems by 20 to 30 percent. To close the gap, 360 uses an agent-based approach that pairs models with security expertise and automated tools. Zhou compares advanced AI vulnerability models to cyber weapons of mass destruction and calls for China to build an equivalent strategic deterrent rather than let the U.S. hold a monopoly. Chinese cybersecurity company Qihoo 360 Security Technology says it has built two AI tools to rival Anthropic's Mythos. The rhetoric sounds like it was pulled straight from the Cold War. Qihoo 360 founder Zhou Hongyi showed off the tools at a conference in Beijing . "Tu Long Feng" automatically hunts for vulnerabilities, while "Yi Tian Zhen" automates cyber defense. Tu Long Feng has already flagged 3,432 vulnerabilities, Zhou said. Zhou puts the gap between top Chinese models and the most capable Western ones at 20 to 30 percent. 360 tries to make up for that with an agent-based approach that pairs models with security expertise and automated tools. "China cannot wait until model capabilities have fully caught up before beginning vulnerability discovery. We cannot afford to wait," Zhou said. Ad Separately, Jie Tang, a Tsinghua University professor who founded Z.ai and recently shipped the well-received GLM-5.2 model , estimated that a Chinese "Mythos" class model would arrive before Q1 2027 . Ad DEC_D_Incontent-1 Without independent tests and benchmarks like those OpenAI and Anthropic provide , there's no way to verify Zhou's claims. But the rhetoric itself is worth paying attention to. In his speech , Zhou went straight for the nuclear comparison. He called Mythos's ability to find vulnerabilities and build attack chains on its own the equivalent of "cyber-nuclear weapons of the AI era." Ad "Why has there never been a real nuclear war? Because both sides had nuclear weapons and deterred each other. The same is true in cybersecurity," he said. China needs an "equivalent strategic deterrent capability." A weapon "that can shift the entire balance of attack and defense must not be left solely in the hands of others." Zhou warned against "one-sided transparency," too. The U.S. could use Mythos to scan Chinese systems for vulnerabilities while China stays blind. "With Mythos, it becomes a situation where the enemy is fast and we are slow, the enemy is many and we are few. You are still relying on a few security experts for analysis, while the other side has already replicated a group of hacker agents to work simultaneously." Ad DEC_D_Incontent-2 He pointed to the export ban on Anthropic's Fable 5 as proof. Fable 5 is the "civilian, neutered version of Mythos," and if someone jailbroke it, the whole world could potentially tap into Mythos-level capabilities. "This is what the U.S. government finds most intolerable. It must ensure that it alone possesses this capability, forming an absolute monopoly over this strategic asset," Zhou said. Ad

中文翻译

中国网络安全公司360安全技术公司推出了两款用于自动化漏洞搜寻和网络防御的AI工具,号称是中国对标Anthropic的Mythos的方案。创始人周鸿祎表示,中国顶尖的AI模型仍然落后西方系统20%到30%。为了缩小差距,360采用了一种基于智能体的方法,将模型与安全专业知识和自动化工具相结合。周鸿祎将先进的AI漏洞模型比作大规模杀伤性网络武器,并呼吁中国建立对等的战略威慑,而不是让美国垄断。中国网络安全公司奇虎360安全技术公司表示,它已经构建了两款AI工具来对标Anthropic的Mythos。这种论调听起来像是直接从冷战时期搬来的。奇虎360创始人周鸿祎在北京的一次会议上展示了这些工具。“屠龙风”自动搜寻漏洞,而“倚天阵”则自动化网络防御。周鸿祎说,“屠龙风”已经标记了3,432个漏洞。周鸿祎将中国顶尖模型与西方最强模型之间的差距定为20%到30%。360试图通过一种基于智能体的方法来弥补这一差距,该方法将模型与安全专业知识和自动化工具相结合。“中国不能等到模型能力完全赶上才开始漏洞发现。我们等不起,”周鸿祎说。另外,清华大学教授、Z.ai创始人、近期发布了广受好评的GLM-5.2模型的唐杰预计,中国版的“Mythos”级别模型将在2027年第一季度之前出现。没有像OpenAI和Anthropic提供的独立测试和基准,就没办法验证周鸿祎的说法。但论调本身值得关注。在演讲中,周鸿祎直接用了核武器类比。他将Mythos自主发现漏洞并构建攻击链的能力称为“AI时代的网络核武器”。“为什么从未发生过真正的核战争?因为双方都有核武器,互相威慑。网络安全也是如此,”他说。中国需要“对等的战略威慑能力”。一种“能改变攻防整体平衡的武器,绝不能只掌握在他人手中”。周鸿祎也警告了“单方面透明”。美国可以用Mythos扫描中国系统的漏洞,而中国却处于盲区。“有了Mythos,就变成敌快我慢、敌多我少的局面。你还在依赖少数安全专家进行分析,而对方已经复制出一群黑客智能体同时工作。”他以Anthropic的Fable 5出口禁令作为证据。Fable 5是“民用、阉割版的Mythos”,如果有人破解它,全世界都有可能获得Mythos级别的能力。“这是美国政府最无法容忍的。它必须确保自己独占这一能力,形成对这一战略资产的绝对垄断,”周鸿祎说。

核心信息

360发布两款AI安全工具,对标Anthropic的Mythos,创始人周鸿祎称中国AI模型落后20-30%,需建立网络核威慑。

  • 360发布两款AI安全工具,对标Anthropic的Mythos,创始人周鸿祎称中国AI模型落后20-30%,需建立网络核威慑。
  • 原贴提到:Chinese cybersecurity company 360 Security Technology has unveiled two A
  • 来源:the-decoder.com

详细解读

这是什么信号?

360公开对标Anthropic的Mythos,并呼吁中国建立“网络核威慑”,标志着中国网络安全公司正将AI安全能力提升到国家安全战略层面。这不仅是一次产品发布,更是将AI漏洞挖掘工具与地缘政治威慑挂钩的明确信号。

为什么重要?

Mythos已被美国视为战略性AI能力,甚至实施出口管制。360的举措表明中国不愿在此领域落后,并试图通过自主研发形成对等威慑。这加剧了中美在AI安全领域的科技冷战,可能推动全球网络安全格局的裂变。

对谁有价值?

中国网络安全从业者、政策制定者、AI安全研究者以及关注地缘政治的投资者。企业应评估自身系统在AI安全工具竞争中的风险敞口。

可以怎么行动?

中国企业可关注360工具的实际效能,并考虑在内部安全流程中引入AI辅助漏洞发现。政策层面,需加速自主AI安全模型的研发与人才培养。投资者可留意相关安全公司的技术壁垒和市场份额变化。

风险或限制

360未提供独立基准测试,其声称的漏洞发现数量与模型能力差距难以验证。夸大性能可能误导决策。此外,将AI安全工具政治化可能引发技术封锁升级,阻碍国际合作与开源共享。

信息差价值

这条内容的真正价值,不只是“有人发布了一个新功能”,而是它揭示了 the-decoder.com 背后的产品方向、工作流变化或竞争信号。对 OPC 来说,这种信息可以转化成持续追踪的栏目选题。

如果把《中国网络安全公司构建AI工具以对标Mythos,并将竞争比喻为网络核威慑》放到你的内容系统里,它最大的价值在于帮助读者更快看懂“为什么值得关注”,而不是只看到一条碎片化动态。

参考来源

上一篇 仅有三个AI模型在500天创业测试中盈利超过起始资本 下一篇 AIHOT 日报参考 2026-06-28